Samsung is losing ground fast against Chinese brands in India

Consumers are getting more and more price conscious when buying smartphones, especially in India. Although Samsung still holds the number one spot in terms of sales in the country, its market share is decreasing.

According to a report from the technology research company Counterpoint, Samsung is losing the battle against low-cost Chinese brands in India. The tech giant’s market share was 21 percent back in November 2016 — latest data available — which is 9 percentage points less when compared with roughly the same period in 2015.

Meanwhile, the market share of Chinese brands including Lenovo, OnePlus, Gionee and Xiaomi has grown quite substantially. Counterpoint reports that these companies have a combined market share of 50 percent in India, compared to just 19 percent a year ago.

See also:

Samsung estimates highest Q4 profit in 3 years despite Note 7 cancellation

4 hours ago

What’s more, in the $120 to $440 smartphone segment, Chinese smartphone manufacturers have more than doubled their presence in India with a 68 percent market share. Samsung’s market share, on the other hand, decreased by 14 percentage points since November 2015 in this segment.

Brands like Xiaomi, OnePlus, and others have become popular among Indian consumers as they offer a better price-performance ratio than big industry names such as Samsung. If this trend will continue well into the future, Samsung will probably have to lower its prices to stay competitive in the Indian market.

But Samsung isn’t the only brand that’s taking a beating. Indian manufacturers like Micromax, Lava, and Karbonn are also experiencing problems as their total market share has dropped down from 40 to less than 20 percent in a single year.

Samsung is losing ground fast against Chinese brands in India

Consumers are getting more and more price conscious when buying smartphones, especially in India. Although Samsung still holds the number one spot in terms of sales in the country, its market share is decreasing.

According to a report from the technology research company Counterpoint, Samsung is losing the battle against low-cost Chinese brands in India. The tech giant’s market share was 21 percent back in November 2016 — latest data available — which is 9 percentage points less when compared with roughly the same period in 2015.

Meanwhile, the market share of Chinese brands including Lenovo, OnePlus, Gionee and Xiaomi has grown quite substantially. Counterpoint reports that these companies have a combined market share of 50 percent in India, compared to just 19 percent a year ago.

See also:

Samsung estimates highest Q4 profit in 3 years despite Note 7 cancellation

4 hours ago

What’s more, in the $120 to $440 smartphone segment, Chinese smartphone manufacturers have more than doubled their presence in India with a 68 percent market share. Samsung’s market share, on the other hand, decreased by 14 percentage points since November 2015 in this segment.

Brands like Xiaomi, OnePlus, and others have become popular among Indian consumers as they offer a better price-performance ratio than big industry names such as Samsung. If this trend will continue well into the future, Samsung will probably have to lower its prices to stay competitive in the Indian market.

But Samsung isn’t the only brand that’s taking a beating. Indian manufacturers like Micromax, Lava, and Karbonn are also experiencing problems as their total market share has dropped down from 40 to less than 20 percent in a single year.

Moto is hosting an event in India for developers to shape the future of modularity


Last year, Moto launched the Moto Mods along with Moto Z. The Moto Mods transform your smartphone in a snap, turning your phone into a camera with optical zoom, a movie projector, a boombox and more.

Moto plans to share the Moto Mods Development Kit (MDK) allowing people everywhere to contribute to the ecosystem by bringing their own Moto Mods to life. The company wants to empower developers to dream, build, and fund their own Moto Mods. The company is hosting ‘Moto Collide’, an event in Bengaluru on January 25, where it will introduce new opportunities to help developers get involved.


The event is focussed on both one-person startups as well as experienced development firms who can their great ideas and interact with different partners across hardware, software, manufacturing, and product development teams to realize them into a global product opportunity. Moto has also partnered with Lenovo Capital who will invest up to $1 million for selected products.

Head to motocollide.com to register, and the Moto team will get back to you on your qualification status within five business days.

Deal: Moto X Pure Edition 64 GB, $250 at Best Buy

The Moto X Pure is on sale at Best Buy for $250 for the 64 GB version. The handset has recently been selling on Amazon for $325, which would net you a saving of $75, though Best Buy states that regular price is currently pegged at $399.

The black variant appears to have sold out already, however the unlocked White and Bamboo versions are still in stock as of the time of publication.

In case you’ve missed it, the Moto X Pure was released in September 2015 and comes with a 5.7-inch QHD display, Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 hexa-core processor (@1.8 GHz) and 3 GB of RAM. There’s also a 5 MP camera on the front, 21 MP at the rear and a 3,000 mAh battery under the hood.

In our Moto X Pure review from the end of 2015, we had plenty of good things to say about it, giving it an 8.7/10 rating and an Editors Choice award.

If you’re interested in picking it up now, just be aware that it arrived with Android 5.1.1 Lollipop, so don’t expect to see it upgraded past Android Nougat. Also note that it lacks a fingerprint scanner and USB Type-C connector, if you’re into that sort of thing.

A letter to the manufacturers – here’s what we want to see in 2017

What a year, huh?

2016 was certainly a year to remember in the smartphone world. Samsung had a major slip up with one of its flagships, Google started making its own phones (and said goodbye to the Nexus line), and we finally got to see something promising come from HTC. We also saw a few OEMs – LG and Lenovo/Moto – step out of their comfort zones and into the realm of modular designs.

In 2016, some companies struggled to find their footing, while others really came into their own. So what happens next?

Join us as we talk about what we want to see from each major smartphone manufacturer in the new year.

Don't miss:

2016 in review: 10 defining moments in the world of Android

5 days ago


Try not to have any phones explode next year, okay?

Okay, let’s get the obvious out of the way: Samsung has a lot of work to do in 2017.

The company started 2016 off with a bang, as it unveiled the Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge at MWC in Barcelona. While the S7 and S7 Edge were described as more of an evolution than a revolution, they did bring a number of big improvements over 2015’s Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge.

For starters, the S7 and S7 Edge featured a refined yet familiar design language that was first present on the S6 line. An all-glass chassis, complimented by an aluminum border really made these phones feel like they were worth the high asking price. This time around, though, the S7 line featured minimized camera humps, curved edges on the back, and came in two different sizes to suit more consumers’ needs. Oh, and they also featured microSD expansion and an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance – two features that were notably missing from the S6 line.

2016 was the year that Samsung really started listening to its customers

2016 was the year that Samsung really started listening to its customers. Because the S7 and S7 Edge succeeded in winning over so many fans, that made the launch of the Galaxy Note 7 even more exciting.

Samsung announced the Galaxy Note 7 in August 2016 amid much fanfare. Not only did the 5.7-inch phone bring top-of-the-line specs, an IP68 water resistance rating and expandable storage, it was basically a bigger, better version of the Galaxy S7 Edge. Like its smaller sibling, the Note 7 featured a curved display – complete with all of Samsung’s Edge software features – along with a curved back panel that made it really easy to hold. Plus, it had a few other tricks up its sleeve, like an iris scanner, a secure folder to hide sensitive content, and a user interface that wasn’t horrible to look at.

See also:

Galaxy Note 7 recall: what you need to know

October 11, 2016

The Note 7 unfortunately had an exploding problem, though, which led to the device getting recalled and permanently discontinued all over the world. The Note 7 will forever be known as Samsung’s exploding phone, and the company is going to spend the next year trying to win consumers’ trust back. That’s why Samsung’s main focus in 2017 needs to be quality control. They’ve already proven to us that they can make some really good phones – the S7, S7 Edge and pre-discontinued Note 7 were some of the best phones of 2016. Now the company needs to make sure that quality control issues never happen again.

In 2017, Samsung needs to make sure none of its phones, you know, explode

Samsung, put the brakes on new, wild innovations if you have to. Heck – just make another great phone that doesn’t injure people. I know a lot of Samsung fans probably wouldn’t have a problem if the Galaxy S8 really turned out to be a repackaged Note 7. That was a really good phone, and now a lot of people feel robbed.

Aside from the whole exploding phone thing, Samsung does still have some other things to work on. Most importantly: software.

I know, we say the same thing every year. My thoughts on the subject are a little different this time around, though. After spending a few months using Android 7.0 Nougat (beta) on the Galaxy S7 Edge, it’s clear that Samsung has worked hard to bring the best version of Nougat to its flagships as it can. While many of the company’s resources are tied up in the Note 7 ordeal, Samsung has done a great job at refining the latest version of Android and making it it’s own.

See also:

This is Nougat on the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

November 28, 2016

With all that said, Samsung has never really been the fastest when it comes to rolling out software updates to its gigantic list of devices. Samsung has just said Android 7.1.1 will roll out to the S7 and S7 Edge in January, while the HTC 10, LG G5, Moto Z and a few others have gotten their updates.

I must say, though, Samsung is getting better. Even though we don’t have official Nougat builds yet, at least we have the community-driven beta program, which is much more than we can say about last year. Look at me, trying to find other things to gripe about. Samsung, just don’t have a repeat of 2016. All in all, you had a hard year… but if anyone can bounce back from a bad year, it’s probably you.


A letter to the manufacturers – here’s what we want to see in 2017

The HTC 10 really impressed, but there’s still more work to be done.

In the smartphone world, a few things really stood out in 2015: Samsung’s Galaxy S6 was beautiful and fast, LG’s G4 wasn’t far behind, and the HTC One M9 was bad. With its atrocious camera and wonky software features, it was clear that HTC didn’t really focus on innovating in 2015. From the One M9 to the too-iPhoney One A9, HTC clearly went through somewhat of an identity crisis in 2015.

That finally changed in 2016 with the HTC 10.

HTC introduced the 10 in April 2016, and overall, it was received quite well in the smartphone community. Not only is the HTC 10 still one of the most well-built phones on the market, the company managed to refine its trademark design without copying other manufacturers’ work or rehashing the same old design of its flagships of years past. It’s clearly an HTC phone through and through.

Also read:

HTC, it’s time for you to come up with a new design

2 weeks ago

HTC refined its software experience this year

One of the main focuses for HTC this year was in the software department, and it shows. Instead of cramming in a ton of useless features or putting a heavy, bloated skin atop the Android we all know and love, HTC managed to put its own spin on things while still staying lean. HTC’s Sense skin is still here, but it’s quicker and lighter than ever before. Perhaps that has a lot to do with the fact that HTC eliminated many of the duplicate apps this year, forgoing its own calculator, calendar and browser apps for Google’s.

Plus, due to the company’s light software interface, the HTC 10 was one of the first smartphones to receive its Android 7.0 Nougat update this year. Not that HTC has been particularly bad at issuing software updates in the past, but it’s always nice to see a company focus on bringing the latest and greatest to its users.

HTC also did something completely unprecedented with the 10: it made a good camera

HTC also did something completely unprecedented with the 10: it made a good camera. While it’s not quite Google Pixel or Galaxy S7 good, it’s still really good. Featuring a 1.55μm UltraPixel sensor with optical image stabilization, an f/1.8 aperture and laser-assisted autofocus, the 10’s camera offers fast and accurate autofocus in most lighting conditions as well as good exposure and noise reduction in low light. It’s miles above what the One M9’s camera offered, but honestly that wasn’t a high bar to clear. Also, for what it’s worth, DxOMark says the 10’s camera is among the best with a score of 88 points.

With all of that said, HTC isn’t in the clear yet.

We wanted a great phone from HTC, and we got one. But 2016 was the year of trying new things, and HTC might have missed out on that a bit. Samsung upheld the idea that edge displays are the future, so the S7 Edge and Note 7 both came with slightly curved displays. LG and Lenovo (or Moto) did something a little more daring this year, bringing modular designs to the masses. But what exactly is so unique about the HTC 10? Aside from its more advanced audio capabilities and sound profiles, what does it offer over the competition?

It doesn’t have that sense of risk taking that most other flagships today offer. It’s not modular, it doesn’t have a crazy dual camera or curved display; it’s just a smartphone. A really good smartphone at that. Now don’t get me wrong, I love most everything about this phone; its design, display, fantastic audio capabilities and software are really some of the best on the market. That’s why in 2017, HTC needs to step out of its comfort zone. Build us a VR-focused smartphone that enhances the HTC Vive somehow, or try your hand at at a modular phone this time around. Heck, if that HTC Ocean concept ever sees the light of day, I’m sure people will buy it.

See also:

HTC 10 vs Samsung Galaxy S7 / Edge vs LG G5

May 6, 2016

As was the case last year, HTC needs to start innovating. They built a great smartphone this year, but there are plenty of other great ones on the market for around the same price or a lot cheaper. If HTC gives people a good reason to buy their phones, things will start shaping up.


A letter to the manufacturers – here’s what we want to see in 2017

You had one heck of a year – just make sure to focus on what the users want.

We left Google out of last year’s manufacturer’s letter for a reason, and that’s because the company never really made its own smartphones. While Google may have had its hand in the manufacturing process of its Nexus phones, they were still made by other manufacturers. Not only that, each Nexus device was notably missing any Google branding, and was instead branded by its manufacturer.

Since the beginning, Nexus devices were Google’s way of bringing a no-frills Android experience to developers and die hard fans of the OS, but that changed significantly in 2016. 2016 was the year the Pixel and Pixel XL arrived, and the year the Nexus line went away.

In 2016, Google created the Pixel and axed the Nexus line

So what are the differences between Nexus and Pixel? Well, as noted above, the Nexus line carried other manufacturer branding and was meant to bring a vanilla Android experience to developers and fans around the world. In contrast, the Pixel is still manufactured by another company (HTC, in this case), but you wouldn’t know it; the Pixel and Pixel XL are only branded with Google’s name, and apparently the company has a bigger say when it comes to the phone’s hardware.

See also:

The best Android phones of 2016, according to you

4 days ago

A lot has changed in the Google phone landscape, and that’s not a bad thing in the slightest. The Google Pixel and Pixel XL were two of the best Android phones released in 2016. They both offer great performance, amazing cameras, and, most notably, they both have the Google Assistant on board.

But if the Pixel and Pixel XL are so great, is there any room for Google to improve? Yes, certainly.

With the switch to Pixel, Google ditched some of the most important things that made the Nexus line, well, the Nexus line. While pricing with the Nexus line has never been super consistent, some of the most recent devices came to market with incredibly affordable price tags. The Nexus 6P and Nexus 5X, for instance, were available at launch for only $499 and $379, respectively. That’s not a lot of money at all, especially considering the Galaxy S6 was still going for over $500 at that time, as were some of the other flagship phones in 2015.

With the switch to Pixel, Google ditched some of the most important things that made the Nexus line great

The Pixels weren’t meant to be affordable in any way, though, which is quite telling by their price tags at launch. The Pixel and Pixel XL came to market for $649 and $769, respectively, which is a stark contrast from the Nexus 6P and 5X’s price tags. All in all, the Pixels arguably offer much less compromise than the 6P and 5X ever did, which might help make the price bump make more sense. Still, that’s not great news for consumers’ wallets – spending upwards of $600 on a new phone isn’t something everyone wants to do.

There are a few other things worth pointing out that make the Pixels’ price points less than stellar. Many flagship smartphones released in 2016 came with impressive water resistant ratings, including the Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, Sony Xperia XZ, and even the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus. Still, despite the Pixel and Pixel XL’s premium price tags, they unfortunately don’t come with any notable ratings for dust or water resistance. Google was reportedly too tight on time to include proper water resistance ratings on the Pixels, but that doesn’t really soften the blow at all. The lack of an IP67 or 68 rating is one of the the only blemishes on the Pixels’ spec sheets.

The Pixels' designs aren't all that unique at all

The fact that the Pixels were rushed out of the door may also have something to do with their unassuming and somewhat generic design. For comparison, the Nexus line has always offered quirky, unique designs that aimed to stand out against the competition, but the Pixel and Pixel XL’s design isn’t all that unique at all. The front panels of the Pixels don’t stand out at all, while the bottom half of the back panel is probably the most generic part of the phones. It’s clear that Google tried to do something slightly original with the glass portion on the back, but that’s about the only thing that stands out.

In our full review, we told you that the build of the Pixel XL leaves a lot to be desired. Despite not being dropped once, there are still a few dents and a couple of scratches on the body. Google seems to have cut some corners in the design department.

I don’t want to harp on Google too much this year… the Pixel and Pixel XL are two of the greatest smartphones ever made. There are just a few things holding them back from being truly no-compromise smartphones. If Google can bring a proper water resistance rating, a more unique design and a slightly more affordable price tag to its 2017 flagships, Google will have a successful year.

Lenovo / Motorola

A letter to the manufacturers – here’s what we want to see in 2017

The Moto Z was a great start on modularity – now keep improving

I used to be a huge Motorola fan. Back in 2014, despite its horrible camera and less-than-perfect processor, I thought the 2nd Generation Moto X was by far one of the best Android phones on the market at the time. With its customizable design via Moto Maker, innovative Active Display feature and smooth, stock-like software, Motorola, in my opinion, hit the nail on the head with the 2014 Moto X. It was innovative, and it was what the people wanted. I consider this to be peak Motorola.

Then 2015 rolled around, and Motorola continued to offer high-end, customizable smartphones that wouldn’t break the bank. The Moto X Pure Edition was the priciest of Motorola’s 2015 lineup, while the 3rd-gen Moto G brought reliable performance and an impressive build without the high price tag. All in all, Motorola had a successful, iterative 2015.

Lenovo took the Moto brand in a new direction in 2016

Throughout the past three years or so, Motorola has been an industry leader in that it went against the norm, offering relatively affordable, customizable, unlocked handsets to consumers. Then in 2016, things started to change. The Motorola we once knew and loved took a different direction, thanks to its new owner, Lenovo.

In June 2016, Lenovo took the wraps off the new Moto Z and Moto Z Force. While Moto X devices of years past focused on hardware customization, the new Moto Z line brought users another way to customize their devices – through modular accessories called Moto Mods. Compatible with the entire Moto Z lineup, Moto Mods are swappable accessories that simply snap on the back of the Moto Z to bring extra functionality to the device.

See also:

Moto Z and Moto Z Force (DROID) review

July 21, 2016

Moto did really well in the hardware department this year. Both the Moto Z line and the Moto Mods themselves feel like premium, well-designed pieces of hardware. But there’s still work to be done, of course, and that has a lot to do with Moto Mod support.

As it stands now, there are a total of seven Moto Mods available for purchase: the JBL SoundBoost Speaker, Moto Insta-Share Projector, Hasselblad True Zoom Camera, Incipio OffGRID Power Pack, Incipio Vehicle Dock, mophie juice pack and Moto Style Shells. So here’s the big question – are Moto Mods useful enough to get consumers to buy a Moto Z? As we stated in our full Moto Mods review, yes and no. Most of the Moto Mods on the market have been well executed and truly bring extra functionality to the device. The problem is, most of them are quite expensive, meaning investing in a Moto Z and a Moto Mod or two can get quite costly.

Modular throwdown:

Motorola Moto Z Force vs LG G5 – Modular or Mods?

August 17, 2016

And although the current Moto Mods on the market are well done, they’re not necessarily needed to make the Moto Z line good. Plus, they’re not the most cost effective way of bringing wireless or Bluetooth solutions to your device. If you’re in need of a louder speaker, for instance, you can always invest in a Bluetooth speaker that costs less than the $79 asking price of the JBL SoundBoost Mod. Or if you’re in need of a better camera, there are plenty of great point-and-shoot cameras for less than the $300 asking price of the Hasselblad Camera Mod.

So what can Lenovo do to make sure Moto Mods catch on? In 2017, Lenovo needs to keep pushing the development of Moto Mods and bring more third-party companies into the mix. That’s already getting off to a good start, too – back in November, the company announced a new partnership with Indiegogo to help jumpstart the next wave of Moto Mods innovation. The Moto Mods Development Kit (MDK) has already been around for awhile, allowing developers to contribute to the ecosystem by creating their own Moto Mods to work with their products. With the Moto Mods Indiegogo campaign, though, developers will be provided with an easy way to raise money to help bring their Moto Mods to life. In addition, Lenovo Capital has set aside up to $1 million to help bring the best Moto Mods ideas to market.

Lenovo needs to keep pushing the development of Moto Mods in 2017

With the help of third-party developers, I think Moto Mods can really prove to be useful add-ons, not just overpriced accessories. But that’s going to require a lot of work on Lenovo’s part.

As a side note, Lenovo, please bring back Moto Maker support for your smartphones. While Moto Maker still exists as a simple color/storage amount selector, I think I can speak for everyone when I say we want the option to choose different colored back plates, front plates, accents and more.

Also read:

Exclusive: Moto X (2017) leaked renders and video

3 days ago


A letter to the manufacturers – here’s what we want to see in 2017

Marketing, marketing, marketing!

Last year, LG was trying to compete directly with Samsung in more ways than one. Samsung had the Galaxy S6, LG had the G4. Samsung had the Galaxy Note 5, LG had the V10. While these competitors were going for a similar demographic, LG’s offerings were quite different from Samsung’s.

This is part of what made the year 2015 interesting in the Android world. Samsung has long been considered as the most popular Android OEM, but then LG swooped in and tried to take some of the company’s users away. That changed in 2016, with the introduction of the LG G5.

On paper, the G5 competes with all of the other major 2016 flagships. It has a 5.3-inch Quad HD display, a Snapdragon 820 processor, 4GB of RAM and even an impressive 16 and 8MP rear-facing camera setup. The G5 also brought something entirely new to the table this year: a modular design. Yes, we’ve already talked about Lenovo’s take on modularity with the Moto Z line, but the G5 actually came out first.

We much prefer Moto's module implementation over LG's

The G5’s modular design is quite different from the Moto Z’s. Instead of simply placing a module on the back of the device, you need to detach and remove the G5’s bottom cap and replace it with something else. If this process sounds more cumbersome to you than the Moto Z’s method, you’d be right. Pulling the cap off the G5 isn’t the easiest thing to do… we much prefer Moto’s method of module integration.

LG only launched two modules (or Friends, as LG calls them) with the G5 at the start: LG CAM Plus, which provides a 1,200mAh boost in battery and better grip for taking photos, and the LG Hi-Fi+ with B&O Play, bringing a 32-bit DAC to the phone. These Friends are nice and all, but the G5 has been out of almost a year and we still have yet to see any more modules for the phone. It’s worth noting that the LG Hi-Fi+ never even made its way to the United States.

So if LG planned to go all-in on modules this year, why has modular development seemingly come to a halt?

That may have something to do with the company’s weird start to modular development. Back in April, LG opened up the G5’s modular design to third-party developers, allowing them to take advantage of software and hardware development kits to make third-party modules for the phone. The problem is, LG noted that each module needs to be co-developed by LG, which would likely slow down the development process drastically. Plus, LG notes that it wants to (understandably so) take a cut of the profits (since it’s co-developing the modules, after all), which might end up turning some devs away from the platform. Starting a modular ecosystem is hard, and it doesn’t seem like LG is taking the right steps to succeed.

Let’s shift gears a little bit and talk about the LG V20. LG announced the V20 just over a month after Samsung launched the Note 7. Now, the Galaxy Note 7 went on sale August 19, still a few weeks before the V20 became official. You’d think LG would want to hit the ground running and get the V20 on store shelves as soon as possible, but that didn’t happen. The company didn’t bring its new flagship device to market until late October (nearly two months after its announcement), after the Note 7 was already recalled and around the time the Google Pixel went up for sale.

The V20 was sort of a missed opportunity for LG

This is why the V20 is potentially a missed opportunity for LG. If the company brought its new device to market just one month earlier, it could have scooped up more folks who jumped the Note 7 ship, and also beaten the Pixel to market. Now, I’m aware that LG can’t just launch a phone whenever it wants to; these things take time. But the phone’s biggest competitor was recalled – that just doesn’t happen. I guess what I’m trying to say is, hindsight is 20/20: LG dragged its feet a little bit and missed the perfect opportunity to sell more units.

So, what can LG do in the new year to improve its smartphone business? Market their products.

In 2017, LG needs to promote its products more than it ever has

In 2017, LG needs to promote its products more than it ever has. If the company wants to continue with its modular ecosystem, then it needs to promote it like it’s a big deal. And if the modules are getting the axe this year, LG still needs to market whatever phone it launches early next year. The same goes for the next phone in the V series. If they want people to know that there are other big and powerful phones out there other than the Note 7, LG needs to put that in front of consumers faces. Tons of commercials, more web advertisements and billboards in big cities are a start. LG has a lot of money, and it needs to spend it in the right areas.


A letter to the manufacturers – here’s what we want to see in 2017

Overpriced smartphones won’t get you anywhere.

I’m going to reiterate a lot of what I said last year, mainly because Sony didn’t really change much at all in 2016.

You may recall that in 2015, the company released three flagship smartphones, the Xperia Z5, Z5 Compact and Z5 Premium. All three devices offered up solid hardware and software experiences, as is the case with most other phones in the Xperia line. The Z5 Premium, though, had one standout feature that made it truly special: a 4K display. With an impressive pixel density of 806ppi, the Z5 Premium wasn’t just a beast on the spec sheet, it offered a little glimmer of hope that Sony would actually start innovating again.

You see, Sony is a company that’s taken the “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” saying a little too far. Most of the smartphones it’s produced in the past five years have looked nearly identical, with only a few minor design changes differentiating each one. Then the Z5 Premium arrived, offering up something we’ve never seen on a smartphone before. Sure, the 4K display didn’t turn out to be incredibly useful (it didn’t show 4K content at all times, for instance), but it was something unique.

Then in 2016, the company ditched the 4K display idea and went back to its old ways.

Back in February at MWC, Sony axed its popular Z lineup to instead focus on the new X line of smartphones. Sony called the X line “an evolution of the Xperia brand”  that were meant to be smart connected devices “capable of changing the way you interact with the world.” Unfortunately that turned out to be marketing mumbo jumbo, as aside from the change in build materials, the new Xperia X, Xperia X Performance and Xperia XA were basically iterative upgrades over the company’s 2015 flagships.

That’s not to say these are bad smartphones, though. The Xperia X is the mid-range offering in the lineup, sporting a 5.0-inch 1080p display, a Snapdragon 650 processor, 3GB of RAM and a 23MP rear camera. The X Performance is the highest-end offering in the bunch, with its Snapdragon 820 processor, 2,700mAh battery and same 23MP rear camera sensor. And if you’re looking for a budget option, the Xperia XA offers a 5.0-inch 720p display, MediaTek MT6755 processor, 2GB of RAM and a 13MP camera.

Unfortunately Sony pulled a Sony and hiked all the prices up by a pretty big margin. The Xperia X Performance launched in the U.S. for a hefty $699, the Xperia X launched for $549, while the low-end XA launched for $279. Compared to some of the other similarly-spec’d devices on the market at the time, Sony’s smartphones were unfortunately one or two hundred or so dollars too expensive.

All of Sony's smartphones were WAY overpriced in 2016

Then partway through the year, Sony launched a phone that stood out. The new Xperia XA Ultra aimed to win over the selfie-obsessed, media-focused crowd. It sports a big 6.0-inch 1080p LCD display with minimal bezels on the right and left sides of the device. In fact, the XA Ultra barely has any bezels at all – its chassis is just a millimeter wider than the 5.7-inch Nexus 6P.

That’s great news! The XA Ultra seems to be the most innovative smartphone the new Xperia X line. And the $369 asking price is certainly not outrageous, especially considering that near bezel-less display.

Why does the Xperia XZ exist?

But then at IFA in September, Sony, for some reason, launched two more smartphones in the X line, further convoluting the company’s 2016 lineup. Oddly enough, the Xperia XZ features most of the same specs as the X Performance. It has a 5.2-inch Full HD display, a Snapdragon 820 processor, 3GB of RAM and a slightly larger 2,800mAh battery. The biggest change with the XZ is its new design, which Sony says is a nod to the legacy of the Xperia line. With a new metallic finish and a “flattened cylinder” design, the Xperia XZ was arguably more attractive than other phones in the X line. But why does this phone exist? Why would Sony create a new phone with mostly the same internals as its other flagship smartphone, only with an upgraded design? The two phones cost similarly, and the U.S. version of the XZ doesn’t even come with a working fingerprint sensor.

See also:

How to activate the Xperia XZ & X Compact fingerprint scanners in the US

October 6, 2016

There’s also the Xperia X Compact, which launched alongside the XZ. Those familiar with Sony smartphones will know how popular the company’s Compact devices have been in the past. Sony has made a name for itself by shrinking down its flagship smartphones to a more manageable size (4.6 inches, in this case), without skimping on the specs. That’s mostly the case for 2016’s X Compact. It comes with a 720p display, a Snapdragon 650 processor, 3GB of RAM and a 23MP rear camera. When comparing the X Compact to other devices in the mid-range segment, the Compact can certainly hold its own. When bringing up the price point, though, that’s where things go downhill. At launch, the X Compact came to market for a ridiculous $499. In a world where the ZTE Axon 7 or OnePlus 3T are selling for less than $500 at launch, there’s no reason anyone should buy the X Compact for $500. Unless they really want a 4.6-inch phone.

Sony is so disconnected with the way smartphones are priced nowadays it's sort of ridiculous

So what does Sony need to do to get people to buy its smartphones again? For starters, it needs to start paying attention to how much smartphones are selling for these days. Sony is so disconnected with the way smartphones are priced nowadays it’s sort of ridiculous. If each one of the company’s smartphones were brought down by $200, they’d offer fierce competition in the Android space. The company’s crowded smartphone line doesn’t need to offer bleeding edge specs, but they also shouldn’t be priced as such.

And as is the case every year, Sony needs to start giving people reasons to buy its smartphones. Consumers aren’t going to buy Sony phones for the cameras alone, or just for the software experience. There needs to be at least one reason worth buying a Sony phone over, say, the Google Pixel, Galaxy S7 or HTC 10.


A letter to the manufacturers – here’s what we want to see in 2017

Don’t forget to be original, and don’t forget about software.

Throughout the first half of 2016, everyone was looking forward to what was coming next from OnePlus. The OnePlus 2 was aging quite a bit, and people were itching for a refresh. Not that the 2 was a bad smartphone, but it did omit a few key things that didn’t really make much sense. For starters, the phone didn’t come with NFC on board, because OnePlus One owners “never used NFC”. That means OnePlus 2 owners weren’t able to take advantage of mobile payments services like Android Pay. The 2 also didn’t have quick charging capabilities, which was becoming more and more popular in other smartphones at the time the device was on the market.

But that’s just the start of it all. Perhaps the biggest downside to owning a OnePlus 2 in 2016 was the fact that OnePlus forgot to update it. The OnePlus 2 didn’t receive Android 6.0 Marshmallow until June 2016, a full eight months after Google released it. That’s downright unacceptable, and OnePlus 2 owners were pretty mad that it took so long.

The OnePlus 2 didn't receive Marshmallow for a full 8 months

All eyes were on OnePlus in June. After releasing the Marshmallow update to the OnePlus 2, the company brought us an all-new handset that drew some attention away from 2015’s seemingly neglected flagship. The OnePlus 3 featured a new design, a bump up in specifications and a bunch of other improvements that made the OnePlus 3 a killer flagship.

On the spec sheet, the OnePlus 3 competed with the best of the best. It sports a Snapdragon 820 processor, plenty of on-board storage, a massive 6GB of RAM, USB Type-C complete with Dash Charge (OnePlus’ own version of quick charging), and a decent 3,000mAh battery. Even though the 5.5-inch display was only of the Full HD variety, it seems most OnePlus fans didn’t care. The 1080p display wasn’t the big news with the flagship, though, it was the design of the phone itself.

The OnePlus 3 is truly a killer flagship

The OnePlus One and OnePlus 2 were unique-looking smartphones. Sure, they were still just slabs with a giant display attached to the front. But compared to the other slabs on the market, these two devices were well thought out and attractive. But with the OnePlus 3, it seems as though OnePlus forgot to take the time to come up with a unique design. That’s not to say that the OnePlus 3 isn’t attractive… it has an all-metal chassis, it’s super comfortable in the hand, and it just feels like a well made device. But it also looks like a lot of the other Chinese smartphones out there. It doesn’t look all that original, which is a shame.

All in all, though, the OnePlus 3 has been very well received throughout its lifetime. That is, the 3’s lifetime was cut pretty short, as OnePlus threw a curveball in November and announced a new flagship that would take the 3’s place.

The OnePlus 3T shares just about everything in common with the OnePlus 3, save for the processor, front-facing camera and battery. This newer, shinier device sports a Snapdragon 821 chipset, as opposed to the 3’s Snapdragon 820. It also comes with a non-removable 3,400mAh battery, up from the OnePlus 3’s 3,000mAh unit. Last but not least, the front-facing camera has been upgraded to a 16MP Samsung 3P8SP sensor, up from the 3’s 8MP Sony IMX 179 sensor. Oh, and one more thing – instead of dropping the price of the OnePlus 3 and still offering it as a more budget-friendly option, OnePlus decided to axe the phone altogether. The company stopped making its June flagship in favor of the 3T, and also charged more at launch for the upgraded device. The 3T came to market for $439, while the 3 was available at launch for just $399.

Now, it’s difficult to harp on OnePlus for launching a newer, better smartphone late in the year. Everyone seems to be in love with the 3T. And thankfully for OnePlus, OnePlus 3 buyers don’t seem to be too burned by the company’s decisions.

OnePlus needs to not drop the ball on software in 2017

So that’s OnePlus in 2016. What do they need to work on in the new year? Honestly, OnePlus had a great year, and there aren’t too many things they need to work on. If anything though, the company needs to focus on bringing more timely software updates to its devices. They waited much too long to update the OnePlus 2 to Marshmallow, and that shouldn’t happen again. Thankfully it seems to be on the right track – a beta build of Android 7.0 Nougat is now available for the OnePlus 3 and 3T, and the company has just announced that stable builds of Nougat are starting to gradually roll out.

See also:

Android Nougat on the OnePlus 3 is impressive, even in beta

December 3, 2016

And one other thing… One of the main reasons why OnePlus became so popular in the beginning was because they promised to do things differently from the other manufacturers. That’s when we got the OnePlus One, 2 and OnePlus X – three solid performing, low-cost phones that sacrificed very little. But the OnePlus 3 and 3T just feel a little boring, and that’s not OnePlus’ style. In 2017, OnePlus needs to innovate a little more, and give users something a little different than they’re used to.


A letter to the manufacturers – here’s what we want to see in 2017

If you keep making phones like the Honor 5X, Honor 8 and Mate 9, people will keep noticing you. 

Buying an Android phone on the cheap used to mean settling for something. Before the days of the Moto G, you couldn’t find a good Android phone for $200 or $300 without sacrificing build quality, specs or features. Now those days are thankfully behind us, and it’s easy to go out and spend a couple hundred dollars and not instantly regret your purchase.

Back at CES 2016, Huawei announced that the Honor 5X, a $200 Android phone with a solid build and great internals, would be making its way to the United States. Why was that such a big deal? For starters, it was the first Android phone Huawei started selling in the U.S. Also, $200 is a really good price for an all-metal phone with these specifications. While the 5X’s speaker and camera turned out to be no good, it still offered a great value to anyone looking for a cheap smartphone with too many compromises.

And you know what? That was really nice to see. The Honor 5X seemed to do pretty well here in the States, and luckily Huawei had more in store for us in 2016.

The Honor 5X offers a lot for very little money

Taking a break from the budget-friendly market, Huawei’s flagships for 2016 were unveiled in April. The Huawei P9 and P9 Plus both feature an all-metal construction, solid under-the-hood specs, and bared a slight resemblance to the company’s beloved 2015 posterchild, the Nexus 6P. Huawei also managed to co-develop the P9 and P9 Plus’ camera sensors with Leica, the popular German optics company, which certainly bought the company plenty of good press (and some bad). All in all, it seems as though the P9 line has done well.

This company was all over the place in 2016. Following the launch of the P9 lineup, the company unveiled the Honor 8 – its newest entry to the budget-friendly flagship segment. With its gorgeous design, great camera and excellent software performance, the Honor 8 enters the market as a direct competitor to the OnePlus 3T and ZTE Axon 7. Sub-$500 flagship smartphones started becoming a thing in 2015, but they got really good in 2016.

In 2016, we also got two new smartphones added to the Mate lineup, the Huawei Mate 9 and Porsche Design Mate 9. These two phones really do have some of the best specs and build quality on the market right now, and Huawei thought it’d be a good idea to price them as such. The Mate 9, which is expected to launch for the US market at CES 2017, is expected to cost around $700, while the Porsche Design Mate 9 currently goes for €1,395, or roughly $1,450. That’s a lot of moolah for a smartphone.

So that was Huawei in 2016. The company launched a smartphone in just about every category this year, and that’s exactly what they should be doing. But there’s one more area the company needs to add just a bit more focus on if it plans on making it big in the States – software.

If you’ve ever read one of our Huawei or Honor reviews, you’re probably aware that the first ‘negative’ we point is in regards to the software. Huawei and Honor phones run the company’s EMUI software overlay, which traditionally has been a bit polarizing to folks in the United States. Mainly its lack of an app drawer, and its iOS-like interface have been seen as major sore points, but also its abundance of unnecessary extras and features that arguably aren’t all that useful.

Huawei's EMUI software might turn some U.S. users away

The good news is that Huawei is aware that its software doesn’t appeal to the western markets the same way it does in the east.

With Huawei’s EMUI 5 the company has finally brought a bit of material design inspired touches to the mix, ditching its odd time-line based layout for both its dialer and notification tray, defaulting to something that’s a bit more akin to what you’d find in a stock Android device. Sure, it’s still not exactly stock, but it finally feels more like Android than iOS. The same goes for icons, which now are more stock-like, and even the multi-tasking (recent apps) menu now takes on a card setup that should be much more familiar to Android users than what was offered in past EMUI iterations. Huawei even gave users the option of an app drawer, though its not turned on by default and requires going through the settings to find it and turn it on.

Overall, the tail end of 2016 saw a positive push in the right direction in terms of software, but the company’s work isn’t done. Some of the things we’d like to see this year is a refined setup process that gives you the option to choose whether you want the app drawer or the iOS-like layout when turning on your phone for the first time. We’d also like to see Huawei continue to work on improving some of its extras, and axing special features that either don’t work well (such as their odd knuckle-based motion features) or are just too gimmicky.

See also:

What’s new in EMUI 5?

November 4, 2016

In many ways, Huawei’s EMUI is in a transitional phase that’s not unlike what we saw with Touchwiz not too long ago, when Samsung started to ax unnecessary bloat in favor of a smoother, easier to use experience. If Huawei and Honor can continue pushing its software forward, while also being mindful of pricing trends, 2017 could be a big year for the company.

So what were your thoughts on 2016? Is there anything you’d like to see from these manufacturers in 2017? Be sure to let us know your opinions in the comment section below!

Exclusive: Moto X (2017) leaked renders and video

The Moto X (2017) has been revealed in a number of new renders and a 360-degree video based on factory CADs. Our man @OnLeaks has uncovered the details, which have historically proven very accurate and the renders based on the CAD information match up very nicely with the in-the-wild shots we saw earlier this month.

See also:

What will 2017 flagship smartphones look like?

1 week ago

While we can’t confirm the Moto X (2017) name just yet, the first thing you’ll notice is just how much the renders look like the current Moto Z. Whether this means the Moto Z represents the new design language for all of Motorola’s Lenovo-branded devices going forward or is just a trickling down of flagship design to other device ranges we can’t say.

Exclusive: Moto X (2017) leaked renders and video

The next thing you’ll notice is the absence of pogo pins and the slight curvature to the back panel, indicating Moto Mods will not be compatible with the Moto X (2017). Oddly, the information obtained by @OnLeaks indicates the Moto X (2017) opts for two “dated” features the Moto Z discarded: microUSB and a headphone port. Keeping the headphone jack makes sense but no USB Type-C, really?

The weird square fingerprint scanner has morphed into a more familiar pill shape and the microSD card slot has migrated to the other side of the top edge. There’s a slight chamfer to the edges of the device but there’s no 2.5D glass to be found, showing Lenovo isn’t afraid to buck more than just one trend. Side bezels are unfortunately on the spacious side, with all these details combined indicating the Moto X (2107) will be a mid-ranger with the Moto Z remaining the flagship.

The large camera bump on the back remains in place, but the Moto X (2017) specs show the device is much thicker than both the Moto Z and Moto Z Force. With dimensions measuring roughly 150 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (9.5 mm with camera bump), the Moto X (2017) looks like it will have plenty of space inside for a large battery. The Moto Z is just 5.2 mm thick and the Moto Z Force is still only 7 mm.

The Moto X (2017) will also have a slightly smaller footprint than either Moto Z variant, but will shrink the display diagonal to 5.2 inches rather than the 5.5 inches shared by both Moto Z models. Fans of fancy dual camera setups or stereo front-facing speakers won’t get any love from the Moto X (2017), but with any luck Lenovo will have beefed up the sound a little. If we’re lucky we’ll see the Moto X (2017) at CES 2017 next week, but a MWC 2017 reveal feels more likely.

Are you happy to see the return of the Moto X? Even if it looks like a mid-range Moto Z?

Moto G4 and Moto G4 Plus Android 7.0 Nougat update rolls out in India

The slow rollout of Android 7.0 Nougat to more and more smartphones continues today, as owners of the Moto G4 and Moto G4 Plus in India can now finally download the latest version of the OS.

See also:

Android Nougat update: when will you get it?

1 week ago

In addition to the upgrade to Nougat, these new updates for Lenovo’s budget-priced smartphones also include the November Android security patches. Since this is a pretty large file to download, Moto G4 and G4 Plus owners in India are advised to connect to a Wi-Fi network to grab this major update. Their phones should also have at least a 50 percent charge beforehand. Finally, the company notes the file could take up to 20 minutes to successfully install on their phone.

If you’re a G4 or G4 Plus owner in India and have yet to receive the update, head to your device’s Settings menu, then choose About phone, then System update. As always the update may take a few days roll out to everyone, so don’t worry if you don’t receive the update right away. If you’re interested in seeing the full changelog for the update, head here.

Moto Z gets a new Nougat update, but not to Android 7.1

The Lenovo Moto Z got the Android 7.0 Nougat update last month, but it has already received another software upgrade, and not just of the security patch variety either. The Android version remains at 7.0, but the bizarrely large 540 MB file does add one very necessary thing: a fix for the low volume notification sound issue many Moto Z owners have been suffering for a month.

See also:

Mods could one day bring 5G data to the Moto Z series

4 weeks ago

That is the only change listed in the update prompt, but there has to be a little more on board other than that in a half-gigabyte file. Post-update, the Moto Z is still rocking the November security update though, so it’s not that. We’ll just have to assume there’s a bunch of other bug fixes and performance improvements in there instead.

The build number is NPL25.86-17-3 and you can check for it manually via Settings > About phone if you don’t see the OTA notification in the next couple days. In the meantime, be sure to take a look at our Best of Android 2016 series, which breaks down each major category of device testing before we eventually crown a manufacturer and device of the year.

Deal: Get Verizon’s Moto Z Droid for just $5 a month at Best Buy

Looking to upgrade your smartphone, but aren’t keen on spending money on a mid-range phone? Best Buy may have a great deal for you. Right now, Verizon’s Moto Z Droid Edition can be yours for just $4.99 a month for 24 months, which means you’ll pay less than $120 for the total cost of the phone over two years.

See also:

Moto Z and Moto Z Force Cases

September 20, 2016

That’s a huge discount, even considering the fact that Verizon is currently selling the same phone on its site for $10 a month for 24 months, which itself is a big price drop from its normal $26 a month. Of course, you will have to stick with the Moto Z Droid for two years on Verizon’s network, but paying less than $120 for this high-end phone may be worth it to many people. The deal is available online, or at your local Best Buy store.

For those of you who might need reminding about the features of the Moto Z Droid, it has a 5.5-inch AMOLED display with a Quad HD resolution, along with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 processor with a clock speed of 2.2GHz. It has 4GB of RAM, 32GB of on-board storage, a 13MP rear camera and a 5MP front-facing camera, along with a 2,600mAh battery and a fingerprint sensor. Moto recently released Android 7.0 Nougat to the Moto Z Droid, meaning you’ll be able to take advantage of multi-window, custom quick settings, Doze on the Go, bundled notifications and much more. One thing worth noting is that the phone does not have the normal 3.5mm headphone jack, which may be a dealbreaker for some people.

The Moto Z Droid also supports the Moto Mods clip-on accessories, which can add things like an extra battery, a better speaker, a projector or a more advanced camera. Motorola has indicated that more Moto Mods are in the works for 2017, including one that will add a Tango-based 3D camera for augmented reality apps.

Get it from Best Buy

Lenovo, ZTE, and others also spotted running Adups OTA spyware


A few weeks ago, local US smartphone manufacturer BLU was caught out unintentionally sending sensitive user data to Adups, a data farming company in China. Unfortunately it appears that this might not be a one off event, as some larger global manufacturers have been spotted using the same unsecure software. According to research conducted by mobile security firm Trustlook, a range of other manufacturers, including notable brands Lenovo, Gionee, and ZTE, have been using software from the same company and their own consumers may be affected.

For a refresher, Adups software is used to provide over-the-air firmware updates for hundreds of companies and also acts as a data collector to build a database for spam text prevention. Some smartphone OEMs choose to pick Adups instead of the OTA alternative for Android provided by Google, which isn’t bad in and of itself. However, the software package was caught out collecting and transmitting sensitive user data without consent, including contact, call, and SMS data, every 72 hours after receiving a modified OTA update. This was initially discovered by Kryotowire researchers monitoring data sent by BLU R1 HD smartphones in the US. BLU never intended to collect this data from consumers and swiftly removed Adups from its phones, but at the time it was also speculated that other manufacturers could also be running the same software with the same risks to consumer data.

Since then, Trustlook has conducted additional research into a wider range of manufacturers and discovered that 43 OEMs have utilized Adups’ Firmware-Over-The-Air (FOTA) technology within the past year. Its research confirms that Adups collects IMEI, IMSI, MAC address, Android version number, and operator information, in addition to the user’s SMS text messages, call log data and contact phone numbers. The researchers have also discovered the identifier (MD5) of 91 additional affected versions of com.adups.fota and com.adups.fota.sysoper applications, which can be used to detect whether a device is affected.

See also:

BLU may be facing a class-action lawsuit over sending user data to China

4 weeks ago

While many of the complicit manufacturers were discovered in China, where Adups is based, the FOTA software has been spotted on All Win Tech smartphones in Taiwan, Archos devices in France, DEXP in Russia, and Prestigio hardware in the Czech Republic. The situation also potentially further affect US consumers, as Lenovo also makes the list accompanying BLU in the US, after Adups software was detected in North Carolina. While BLU is only a small manufacturer, Lenovo is a global Android manufacturer selling devices in every major region, and also owns the Motorola brand which is particularly popular in the US and Europe. Chip manufacturer MediaTek, which is based in Taiwan, is also on the list, and could mean that a larger number of devices are affected. It’s possible that this detection is just the tip of the iceberg.

This revelation contradicts an earlier statement from Adups, which claimed that the surveillance features of its FOTA software were specifically developed for the Chinese market, and that it was unintentionally sent as an update to BLU devices in the US. Even more worryingly, the software has already been shown to execute remote commands with escalated system privileges, and can therefore reprogram devices with OTA updates, as is what happened with BLU. This suggests that the company could switch on data collection for any affected handsets by these manufacturers at any time, if it hasn’t done so already, even without an OEM’s knowledge.

Trustlook’s list of manufacturers who have devices running Adups can be found below.

  • Aaron Electronics
  • Aeon Mobile
  • All Win Tech
  • Amoi Technology
  • Archos
  • AUX
  • Bird
  • BLU
  • Cellon
  • Coship Mobile
  • DEWAV Communication
  • DEXP Digital Experience
  • Eastaeon Technology
  • Electronic Technology
  • Gionee
  • GOSO
  • Hisense
  • Hongyu
  • Huaqin
  • Inventec Corporation
  • Konka Group
  • Lenovo
  • Logicom
  • Longcheer
  • Malata Mobile
  • Mediatek Helio
  • Prestigio
  • Ragentek
  • RDA Micro
  • Reallytek
  • RUIO
  • Sanmu
  • Sprocomm
  • Tinno
  • Uniscope
  • VSUN
  • Water World Technology
  • Wind Communication
  • WingTech
  • Yifang Digital
  • Zhuhai Quanzhi
  • ZTE

Unfortunately this research doesn’t explicitly tell us if these manufacturers are using versions of Adups that are currently transmitting sensitive user data, nor which smartphones are potentially affected. So we don’t know for sure how many of these manufacturers are actually complicit, intentionally or otherwise, in sending what should be confidential user data to Adups.

What also muddies the situation is that although BLU wasn’t aware of the situation on its device, other manufacturers may well be. It’s previously been suggested that shady terms and conditions accepted when setting up a new phone could allow for manufacturers to transfer this type of information with the user’s “consent”. If you are really concerned about the possibility of Adups spying on your messages and other data, it may be wise to steer clear of all of these manufacturers until they clarify the situation.

See also:

These were the biggest password hacks of 2016

1 week ago

If you currently own a device from one of the manufacturers on the list, Trustlook has incorporated a test for Adups into its AntiVirus software. Clever marketing, I know. You can download it for free from the Google Play Store. Although there are in-app purchases, annoying notifications, and it’s own privacy policy states that the app will collect app and other data which can be transferred to affiliated companies around the world, including advertisers, sponsors and other partners. That’s all quite typical for free antivirus software these day, but you’re not alone if you think this sounds a bit hypocritical given the circumstances.

Given that BLU was able to quickly remove the offending software from its devices, it will be telling to see how swift and willing other companies act to remove Adups from their phones, if at all. Currently no other manufacturers have admitted to being involved in this data collection fiasco.